Training in Shared Decision-making Not Applicable
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention:
The “Ready for SDM digital training module was developed based on a proven effective German module.
Learning objectives
After the course the participants should be able to:
1. Explain background and rationale for SDM and the situations in which it is relevant
2. Explain and justify the s
Sponsors
Helse Sør-Øst RHF - South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Physicians working in hospital trust within the South-eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Those already having undertaken any SDM-training in the past two years.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Agreement between the participants’ and an expert assessment of patient involvement in a video recorded consultation. The extent to which a clinician evaluates observed communication accurately was determined to be a reasonable proxy for SDM communication competencies. To assess this ability, participants will be exposed to a video of a decision consultation and asked to score their observations using an the MAPPIN´SDM observer sheet. In the current study, the observer scale focusing the patient-health care provider dyad was chosen to measure the communication performance. Judgements will be made immediately after the training or the waiting condition, respectively. Accuracy is calculated using weighted T coefficients calculated pairwise between participants’ judgements and an expert standard rating. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. The ability to identify SDM relevant decisions will be assessed using a open-ended question within a questionnaire before (control group) or after (intervention group) the intervention. 2. Basic knowledge about SDM will be assessed using a five-item multiple choice knowledge test (questionnaire), previously used in similar studies and in other modules within the Ready for SDM framework. The level of achieved knowledge will be assessed immediately after the training (intervention group) or before the training (control group). 3. Additional feedback regarding the intervention will be collected after the intervention using a questionnaire. | — |
Countries
Norway
Outcome results
None listed