Skip to content

A randomised feasibility study to assess the use of serial magnetic resonance imaging to reduce treatment times in Charcot neuroarthropathy in people with diabetes

A randomised feasibility trial to define outcome measures for acute Charcot neuroarthropathy in Diabetes and their use in assessing clinical management

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN74101606
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-11-10
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes mellitus Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine Diabetes mellitus

Interventions

This study is a 2-arm open labelled randomised controlled study. It investigates the feasibility of using serial MRI to monitor CN. The study lasts for 3 years. There is an 18-month recruitment period

Sponsors

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Participants who are willing and have capacity to give informed consent. 2. People with diabetes as diagnosed by the WHO criteria https://www.diabetes.org.uk/Documents/Professionals/hba1c_diagnosis.1111.pdf (Appendix 1) 3. Age 18 years or over 4. New or suspected new diagnosis of acute CN (no previous incidence of acute CN within the last 6 months on the same foot) treated with off-loading 5. Understand written and verbal instructions in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. People who have received a transplant and others receiving immunosuppressant therapy or using glucocorticoids other than in the routine management of glucocorticoid deficiency 2. Contra-indication for MRI 3. Treatment for previous suspected CN on the same foot in the last 6 months 4. Suspected or confirmed bilateral active CN at presentation 5. Active osteomyelitis at randomisation 6. Previous contralateral major amputation 7. Inability to have an MRI scan 8. Patients receiving palliative care

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility outcomes are assessed using eCRF reported by research teams from patient notes: 1. The proportion of patients who meet the eligibility criteria 2. The number of eligible patients recruited 3. The number of participants in which an alternative diagnosis is made during the active phase of the trial 4. The proportion of patients that withdraw or are lost to follow up 5. Statistical parameters of the key outcome measures to inform a sample size calculation for a definitive trial (estimate of effect size) 6. Ability to collect quality of life and resource use data

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy outcome measures are assessed using the eCRF reported by research teams from patient notes: 1.1. Preliminary data on days with immobilisation at the end of the active phase of the study 1.2. Progression of foot deformity from randomisation to the end of the follow up phase of the study 1.3. Number of new ulcerations on the index foot at the end of the follow up phase of the study 1.4. Number of new ulcerations on the contralateral foot at the end of the follow up phase of the study 1.5. Number of new infections on the index foot at the end of the follow up phase of the study 1.6. Number of new infections on the contralateral foot at the end of the follow up phase of the study 1.7. Number and severity of falls (Hopkins Fall Grading System) at the end of the follow up phase of the study 1.8. Number of minor and major amputations on the index foot at the end of the follow up phase of the study 1.9. Number of minor and major amputations on the contralateral foot at the end of the follow up phase of the study 1.10. The number of participants in each arm requiring further intervention for CN (e.g. further immobilisation) within 6 months of remission Patient Reported Outcome Measures are measured at 3, 6, 9, 12 months, at remission and at the end of the follow up phase of the study: 2.1. Level of pain is measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale - VAS 2.2. Health related quality of life is measured using EQ-5D-5L and SF12 2.3. Anxiety and depression is measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Economic Evaluation 3.1. Resource use is assessed through a patient diary at the end of the follow up phase of the study

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026