Skip to content

A randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of rotator cuff repair with or without augmentation with porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) for large rotator cuff tears: Pilot study phase

A randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of rotator cuff repair with or without augmentation with porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) for large rotator cuff tears: Pilot study phase

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN73698035
Enrollment
60
Registered
2005-09-05
Start date
2003-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator cuff tears Musculoskeletal Diseases Large rotator cuff tears

Interventions

1. Standard open rotator cuff repair 2. Standard open rotator cuff repair augmented with porcine small intestine submucosa (RESTORE patch)

Sponsors

McMaster University (Canada)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients (18 - 65 years old, either sex) with large rotator cuff tears (Type 1B or Type 2) determined by clinical examination and diagnostic imaging. Criteria described by Harryman et al. (1991) will guide the classification of rotator cuff tears defined and reassessed at the time of surgery (Type 0 = intact cuff, Type 1A = thinned cuff or partial thickness defect, Type 1B = full thickness defect on one tendon, Type 2 = full thickness defect of two tendons, Type 3 = full thickness defect of three tendons).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous shoulder surgery, excluding acromioplasty or diagnostic arthroscopy 2. Inability of the surgeon to repair the tear with remaining defect no greater than 5 mm in diameter 3. Evidence of other significant shoulder pathology including, Type II-IV SLAP lesion, Bankart lesion 4. Active joint or systemic infection 5. Significant muscle paralysis of the shoulder girdle 6. Migration of the humeral head as demonstrated on plain radiograph 7. Major medical illness that would preclude undergoing surgery 8. Patients who are unwilling or unable to be assessed according to study protocol for one year following surgery 9. Major psychiatric illness, developmental handicap or inability to read and understand the English language

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) 2. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons standardized tool (ASES) 3. The Simple Shoulder Test (SST) 4. The Constant 5. The SF-36

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success or failure of the rotator cuff repair. Patients will undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the rotator cuff one year post-operatively to determine whether the defect has healed, and if not healed completely, whether the remaining full thickness defect is greater than 5 mm in any dimension. If such a defect remains, the patient is classified as having failed the repair.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026