Skip to content

FReSH START – Looking at new approaches for people who self-harm

Function REplacement in repeated Self-Harm: Standardising Therapeutic Assessment and the Related Therapy (WP4 - Randomised Controlled Trial)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN73357210
Enrollment
565
Registered
2021-08-03
Start date
2021-10-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Self harm Mental and Behavioural Disorders Intentional self-harm

Interventions

The FReSH START RCT is a 1:1 randomised controlled trial of standard care plus referral to intervention (one of three adapted therapies) vs standard care alone. It will take place across 12 sites with

Sponsors

University of Leeds
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 18 years or over 2. Registered with a GP in the catchment area of the mental health trust for the duration of the therapy 3. Presenting at ED as a consequence of self-harm, defined as: intentional acts that directly harm a person's own body. This includes methods like cutting, burning, scratching, banging or hitting parts of the body, or interfering with wound healing and it also includes self-poisoning, such as taking overdoses of drugs 4. Self-harm episode in the preceding three months that is at least their 3rd episode in the preceding 12 months and their lifetime 4th or more episodes 5. Has mental capacity to provide fully informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Receiving, or having been referred to (and likely to receive this within the next 6 months), a specific psychological intervention that is similar to the trial intervention, or where a specific intervention is indicated for a related condition (e.g. anorexia nervosa or drug addiction) and would conflict with trial participation. 2. Taken part in the FReSH START Feasibility study 3. Assessed by clinician to currently be unsuitable for therapy (e.g. in crisis; actively suicidal, unable to tolerate therapy - i.e. past talking treatments have resulted in severe deterioration of mental state, has a diagnosis of schizophrenia, autism, or other form of severe mental illness that would be a contraindication for the talking treatments in this study - n.b. people with schizophrenia are offered CBT but it is tailored specifically to help with psychotic experiences. The CBT in this study is not specifically tailored for the needs of people with schizophrenia) 4. Lacking capacity to comply with study requirements 5. Insufficient proficiency in English to contribute to the data collection 6. Known risk of violence (for example reported by ED or liaison psychiatry staff) 7. Researcher unable to contact potential participant within 6 weeks following self-harm event

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Global distress measured using CORE-OM at 12 months from randomisation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Global distress measured using CORE-OM clinical score at 6 and 12 months 2. Time to repetition of self-harm leading to hospital attendance at a minimum of 12 months (HES data supplemented by clinical record check). 3. Response to “In the past four weeks, on how many occasions have you harmed yourself” asked via monthly text message and at 6 and 12 months 4. Hopelessness measured using the Beck Hopelessness Scale total score at 6 and 12 months 5. Depression measured using PHQ-9 total score at 6 and 12 months 6. The degree to which youth feel connected to others in their social environment measured using Social Connectedness Scale-Revised at 6 and 12 months 7. Cost-effectiveness outcome measures: 7.1. Cost of health care resource use including primary, community, and social care, emergency, admitted and outpatient hospital care, cost of prescribed psychotropic medications at 6 and 12 months. 7.2. Using utility as measured by the preference based measure CORE 6D generated from CORE-OM at 6 and 12 months 7.3. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed in terms of incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) at 6 and 12 months, and at 5 years (using decision analytic modelling). 8. Internal pilot outcome measure: Recruitment and follow-up rates at 9 months 9. Process Evaluation outcome measures: 9.1. Proportion of participants attending therapy, completing the required number of therapy sessions, number of early drop-outs from treatment, reasons for early drop outs, overall and by therapy type (CBT, ACT, PIT) 9.2. Fidelity to the safety and FReSH START components measured by therapist-reported session checklist 9.3. Fidelity to the safety and FReSH START components measured by researcher (from audio recordings of therapy sessions) 9.4. Researcher-rated fidelity to therapy-specific intervention components (from audio-recordings of therapy sessions)

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026