Comparing conventional verses contact force and electrical coupling index in atrial flutter ablation

Randomised trial comparing conventional versus contact force and electrical coupling index in atrial flutter ablation (VERISMART TRIAL)

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN72708537

Enrollment

120

Registered

2015-01-15

Start date

2015-02-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Topic: Cardiovascular disease

Interventions

CF versus ECI in CTI flutter

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age =18 years 2. Documented paroxysmal or persistent atrial flutter

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Inability or unwillingness to receive oral anticoagulation 2. Previous ablation procedure for AFL 3. Unwillingness or inability to complete the required follow up arrangements 4. Concomitant atrial fibrillation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time to bidirectional block	—

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026