Skip to content

A multicentre pilot study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial to investigate whether carrying out invasive bladder function tests in women about to undergo operations for stress incontinence alters the outcome of their surgery

INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?: a pragmatic multicentre pilot study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN71327395
Enrollment
120
Registered
2010-06-07
Start date
2011-01-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress urinary incontinence in women Urological and Genital Diseases Other disorders of urinary system

Interventions

Invasive urodynamic testing
dual-channel subtracted cystometry with simultaneous pressure/flow voiding studies is the most commonly applied technique in the evaluation of patients prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence

Sponsors

Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women with a clinical diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence, who have completed their family, and have undergone a course of pelvic floor muscle training (+/- other non-surgical treatments for their urge symptoms) with inadequate resolution of their symptoms, where both the woman and clinician agree that surgery would be an appropriate and acceptable next line of treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Symptomatic utero-vaginal prolapse requiring treatment 2. Previous surgery for urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse 3. Neurological disease causing urinary incontinence 4. Unable to give competent informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The aim of this feasibility study is to estimate (via the pilot trial) rates of patient recruitment, randomisation, retention and response, logistics of trial methodology, and resource utilisation, and (via the clinician survey & interviews) clinicians' willingness to randomise. Qualitative patient interviews will explore understandings and experiences of the study, including participation decisions. In addition, estimation of the parameters of the primary outcome (from the pilot trial) would allow the sample size of a definitive trial to be determined. The proposed primary outcome of the future definitive trial is the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS - combined score) at 6 months after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes of the definitive trial will include: 1. SF-36 general health questionnaire 2. Quantification of urinary leakage by 2.1. Bladder diary 2.2. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence, Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) 3. Prevalence of symptomatic 'de novo' functional abnormalities including voiding dysfunction and detrusor overactivity (subscales of ICIQ-FLUTS, with cystometry in symptomatic patients) 4. Impact of urinary symptoms on quality of life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) 5. Utility values computed from EQ-5D & SF-6D 6. Costs These will all be rehearsed within the pilot study with a view to refining the choice of secondary outcomes for the main trial, based on data yield and quality. Longer term follow-up may also be considered as a secondary outcome in the definitive trial.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026