Skip to content

Randomised controlled trial of restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy for instrumental delivery - a multicentre pilot study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN69736659
Enrollment
200
Registered
2006-04-20
Start date
2004-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Instrumental vaginal delivery Pregnancy and Childbirth Instrumental vaginal delivery

Interventions

Restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy

Sponsors

University of Dundee (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Primgravidae 2. Singleton 3. Cephalic presentation 4. At term ( >37 weeks gestation) 5. No contraindications to vaginal delivery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Poor English 2. Maternal age <16 years 3. Inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Third or fourth degree perineal tears

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Mother's perception of pain 2. Length of postnatal hospital stay 3. Rate of maternal healing complications 4. Neonatal trauma

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026