Skip to content

Mental practice for arm recovery early after stroke

MEntal practice for the RehabIliTation of the upper-limb in acute Stroke: a feasibility randomised controlled trial with process evaluation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN69014227
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-07-17
Start date
2026-08-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke Circulatory System

Interventions

Potential research participants will be screened when they attend the stroke wards at the two NHS locations participating in the study. If they are deemed initially eligible, they will be approached a

Sponsors

University of Lancashire
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. At least 18 years old 2. Diagnosed with an ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke within the previous 4 weeks (2 weeks where possible) 3. Demonstrate upper-limb deficits (defined as a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS, Motor Arm score of 1-4 on admission) 4. Baseline Action Research Arm Test of less than 50, indicating significant arm and hand dysfunction 5. Are eligible to receive onward physical rehabilitation either in the community or another rehabilitation setting 6. Can comprehend simple verbal instructions assessed by Oxford Cognitive Screen and 4 items from a subset of the COMPASS Assessment to assess ability to complete multiple-step instructions 7. Can provide feedback on experiences (with support from a carer if required) 8. Are likely to be able to undertake mental practice, evidenced by a score indicating more than 50% correctness on hand laterality judgement test (5/10)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who do not have capacity to consent despite materials being available in accessible formats and other languages 2. Have significant hearing loss despite corrective aids 3. Are not fluent (listening) in English, Polish, Indian Punjabi or Urdu 4. Receiving end-of-life care 5. Have significant other impairment of the upper limb such as frozen shoulder, complex regional pain syndrome, orthopaedic injury that would prevent completion of movements required for the outcome measurements 6. Have health conditions that limit or prevent engagement with rehabilitation 7. Currently participating in another stroke rehabilitation trial 8. Are likely to be discharged to a location outside a practical working distance from the recruitment location during the intervention or follow-up period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Locations recruited, participants screening, proportion of screen patients recruited to study, and recruitment rate, measured using screening log and recruitment data at enrolment;Proportion of recruited participants remaining in the study measured using recruitment, follow-up and withdrawal data at 6 weeks (end of intervention) and 3 months (follow up);Engagement data collected by MyArm (digital platform): actual use as a proportion of recommended total number of sessions (5 sessions a week) measured using app usage tracking at 6 weeks;Engagement data collected by MyArm (digital platform): dose as a proportion of recommended use (100 minutes per week) measured using app usage tracking at 6 weeks;Process evaluation measured using semi-structured interviews of purposively selected participants to reflect those who did not complete the intervention (<50% sessions completed n = up to 10), those who completed either intervention or control (n = up to 20) intervention and clinical staff delivering usual care (up to n = 12) at throughout the study duration;Upper extremity activities limitations measured using Action Research Arm Test at baseline, end of intervention and follow-up;Upper extremity impairment measured using the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment at baseline, end of intervention and follow-up;Fatigue severity measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale at baseline, end of intervention and follow-up;Quality of life measured using EQ-5D-5L at baseline, end of intervention and follow-up;Outcome tool completion rates measured using eligibility, baseline and follow-up data at 6 weeks and 3 months;Qualitative insights from process evaluation measured using semi-structured process evaluation interviews at throughout the study duration

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There are no secondary outcomes

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactAlison Gibbon
LCTUMerits@lancashire.ac.uk+44 (0)1772 895543

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026