Skip to content

Assessing the effectiveness of a screening interview for identifying observable cues of mental health disorders using artificial intelligence and in various modes of interaction

Pediatric RObot-aided versus Moderator-led Interview Screening (PROMIS): Comparative effectiveness of three pre-clinical assessment modalities for identifying observable mental health cues in children and adolescents ages 10-19

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN68006163
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-04-16
Start date
2025-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Assessment of pre-clinical psychiatric interview methodologies for pre-screening of mental health disorders in children and adolescents aged 10-19 years Mental and Behavioural Disorders

Interventions

This interventional study employs a prospective, controlled, mixed-methods design with three randomized arms to evaluate different approaches to pre-clinical psychiatric interviews for children and ad

Sponsors

University Clinical Centre Maribor
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
10 Years to 19 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Included in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric treatment: patients of the Unit for pediatric and adolescent psychiatry of the University Medical Centre Maribor (inpatient or outpatient) 2. Age Range: 10 - 19 years old at the time of consent. 3. Cognitive Ability: Participants must have the cognitive capacity to understand and respond to the questions posed in the interviews. This can be preliminarily assessed through a short standardized cognitive screening appropriate for the age group. 4. Language Proficiency: Participants must be fluent in the language in which the interviews are conducted to ensure accurate understanding and response to the questions. 5. Consent: Participants must be able to provide written informed consent or assent, and legal guardians must provide written informed consent for participation in the study for those younger than 15. 6. Availability: Participants must be available for the duration required to complete all study components, including any follow-up evaluations or debriefings.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Intellectual disability: Children and adolescents with mild to severe intellectual disabilities that may interfere with their ability to understand or engage with the interview process as designed. 2. Urgent Psychiatric Conditions: Children and adolescents experiencing life-threatening conditions or other conditions requiring immediate psychiatric treatment; e.g. agitation, aggression, acute psychosis 3. Sensory Impairments: Children with uncorrected hearing or visual impairments that would prevent interaction with the chatbot, human interviewer, or robot, unless reasonable accommodations can ensure effective participation. 4. Medical Conditions: Severe medical conditions or instability that could interfere with the participant’s ability to attend sessions or respond reliably, such as uncontrolled epilepsy or significant physical illnesses requiring intensive care.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. The relevance, the content (also consider language is age-appropriate), and the value of the pre-clinical interview questionnaire for child and adolescent psychiatric practice. Measured using a custom questionnaire for experts to evaluate the value of a screening interview, focusing on information relevance, clinical utility, and integration with other assessments. The questionnaire will assess how the interview contributes to understanding children's and adolescents' mental health, treatment planning, and overall clinical evaluation. The questionnaire is applied once and after reviewing each diary recording 2. Feasibility and willingness of children and adolescents to carry out and complete the interview independently. Measured using custom participant questionnaire (2 items) and BFI-2-XS and ITAS, before the experiment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Compare the effectiveness and responses when the interview is moderated by different methods: a chatbot as a moderator, a human moderator, and a socially assistive humanoid robot as moderator measured using BIDR-16 immediately after the experiment 2. Evaluate the user experience (UX) of children and adolescents under the different moderators using a combination of G-MISS and custom participant questionnaire (1 item) with the screening interview immediately after the experiment

Countries

Slovenia

Contacts

Public ContactIzidor Mlakar
izidor.mlakar@um.si+386 2 220 7267

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026