Skip to content

Kinematic Motion Analyses of Upper Extremity After Intensive Training with Spring-assisted Dynamic Hand Orthosis in Patient with Stroke

Effects of Spring Assisted Dynamic Hand Orthosis Training on Functions and Movement Smoothness of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity: A randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN67543440
Enrollment
10
Registered
2010-10-19
Start date
2009-12-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiparesis due to Stroke Circulatory System Stroke, not specified as haemorrhage or infarction

Interventions

Patients will undergo training activities while each wore a spring assisted dynamic hand orthosis. Training will be guided by a physiotherapist for 1 hour per day per week for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Yonsei University College of Medicine (South Korea)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 18 years or older 2. Unilateral hemiparesis more than 6 months post-stroke duration 3. No current or previous orthopedic or surgical histories affecting the hemiparetic upper extremity 4. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Korean version - score = 23 (to ensure that they fully understood the study procedure) 5. Patients should have at least some active voluntary movement of the upper extremity (i.e., 10 degrees of shoulder flexion/abduction, 10 degrees of elbow flexion/extension, and 30 degrees of interphalangeal proximal joints / 20 degrees of interphalangeal distal joints of volitional finger flexion when the hand is positioned in wrist and finger extension) 6. No flaccidity of the affected limb 7. No severe contracture or spasticity of the affected wrist or hand

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Does not match inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
3 clinical assessments and the measurement of grip strength. Fugl-Meyer Assessment and grip strength and Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test. All outcomes were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks of training.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Spatiotemporal parameters were collected using a 3-D motion analysis system and workstation software pre- and post-test (VICON MX system, Oxford Metrics, U.K.). Data collection was conducted at the Motion Analysis Research Laboratory in the Yonsei University. All outcomes were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks of training.

Countries

Korea, South

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026