Skip to content

A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing the post-operative pain experience following vitrectomy with a 20-gauge system and the new 25-gauge transconjunctival system

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN66846344
Enrollment
50
Registered
2005-09-30
Start date
2005-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Signs and Symptoms: Post operative pain Signs and Symptoms Post operative pain

Interventions

20-gauge system vs new 25-gauge transconjunctival system

Sponsors

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2005 Update - Department of Health (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Added April 2008: 1. Patients with suitable pathology for the 25 gauge system eg macula hole, epiretinal membrane, vitreous opacities 2. Primary vitrectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Added April 2008: 1. Previous vitrectomy 2. Unwilling to accept randomisation 3. Unable to give informed consent 4. Pre-operative inflammation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Post-operative pain scores using verbal and visual analogue scales 2. Use of post-operative analgesia

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Post operative pain Added April 2008: 1. Time taken to perform surgical procedure 2. Post operative inflammation 3. Per-operative and post-operative complications

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026