Orthotic fabrication among occupational therapy students Other
Conditions
Interventions
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of three different teaching methods using two primary outcome measures: 1. splint quality assessment and 2. student self-reported confidence and satisfaction
Sponsors
Kuwait University
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Actively enrolled in the OT program 2. Available for the full duration of the training 3. No prior experience in splint fabrication
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Students with previous training in orthotic fabrication or those unable to commit to all scheduled sessions
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Splint Quality Assessment: this assessment will be used after the training period where each participant will fabricate a wrist cock-up splint independently, which will be assessed by two expert evaluators using a validated grading sheet. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Student Confidence and Satisfaction Survey: before the training program and after the independent splint fabrication, participants will complete an online self-assessment survey measuring: 1. Confidence in splint fabrication 2. Perceived preparedness for clinical practice 3. Overall satisfaction with their assigned learning method | — |
Countries
Kuwait
Contacts
Public ContactAnfal Alhuwaidi
Outcome results
None listed