Skip to content

Care Confidence in Action

Supporting self-funders to make confident care decisions: ‘Care Confidence in Action’

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN66511322
Enrollment
162
Registered
2026-07-03
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Care decisions Other

Interventions

This is an implementation science-informed process evaluation. The focus of the evaluation is the process through which Care Confidence related interventions are implemented by local authorities and v

Sponsors

University of York
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The following inclusion criteria apply for staff participating in surveys, interviews and focus groups: 1. Staff (including volunteers) involved in any capacity in delivering a Care Confidence related intervention 2. Staff involved in managing the implementation or delivery of a Care Confidence related intervention The following inclusion criteria apply for self-funders and carers participating in interviews: 1. Any adult offered, signposted to, or using any Care Confidence related intervention designed and/or delivered as part of Care Confidence in Action

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Staff not involved in the delivery, management or implementation of Care Confidence related interventions for the Care Confidence in Action research or research sites 2. People without capacity to give informed consent 3. People under 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The following three outcomes of interest will be measured using the NoMAD survey [https://normalization-process-theory.northumbria.ac.uk/nomad-study/] at baseline, 1 year, 21 months and 25 months: 1. Level of normalisation (embedding over time) 2. Fidelity of implementation and use (the degree to which what is happening matches what was intended) 3. Dose (how much of the intervention is necessary to have benefit) Staff interviews and focus groups, along with interviews with service users about their experiences of receiving interventions, will qualitatively inform our understanding of fidelity, dose and implementation success.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There are no secondary outcomes

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactSarah Brown
sarah.brown3@york.ac.uk+44 (0)1904 321263

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026