Skip to content

The effects of trail versus road running on neuromuscular performance

The effects of an 8-week trail versus road running program on neuromuscular performance parameters in healthy middle-aged adults: A two-armed randomized controlled pilot study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN66167429
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-12-04
Start date
2016-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Falls and fall-related injury due to physical inactivity and accelerated aging-induced functional decrements across all bodily systems, which also compromise the performance of activities of daily living (ADL) Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning Falls and fall-related injury

Interventions

All participants are asked to answer the International Physical Activity Questionnaire – Short Form (IPAQ-SF), the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q&YOU), and the American College of Sp

Sponsors

University of Basel
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Between 18-59 years of age 2. Currently sedentary or had not exercised more than twice a week for the last three months 3. If a person has two risk factors related to cardiovascular disease, they are required to have a medical exam and physician consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. If a person had more than two risk factors in the American College of Sports and Medicine (ACSM) Risk Stratification 2. Didn't meet the age range, 3. Worked out more than 2x a week.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
All measurements were conducted once for each participant at baseline and a second time within 1 week after completion of the 8-week intervention/training program. 1. Static balance was measured using the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System) test 2. Dynamic balance was measured using the Y-balance test 3. Gait was measured using the Rehagait gait analysis device during level walking at self-selected walking-speeds under single and dual task conditions 4. Agility was measured using the Agility T-Test 5. Strength was measured using the BIODEX Multijoint System 4 Pro for dominant isokinetic leg strength, applying the knee and ankle device (knee extension/flexion, ankle plantar/dorsi flexion)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Predicated maximal oxygen consumption is measured using the Parvo Medics True One 2400 metabolic measurement system via indirect calorimetry. Participants are tested on a treadmill applying the Pepper protocol. Briefly, the protocol starts with an inclination of of 0% and a velocity of 2.5 miles per hour. Exercise intensity increases every minute by elevating either inclination or velocity. Tests are terminated when subjects reached 85% of their predicted VO2max. All posttests are scheduled at the same day and similar times of the day as pretestings.

Countries

United States of America

Contacts

Public ContactMarisa Heckendorn

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026