New communication technology and services for older persons Not Applicable
Conditions
Interventions
The intervention consisted of a mobile safety alarm with an inbuilt drop sensor. The mobile alarm was a prototype in development and uses a positioning system patented Europe-wide. The alarm went off
Sponsors
City council Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Having a home-based alarm 2. Community-dwelling 3. Being able to go outside alone 4. Willingness to participate
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Confined to bed
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Primary outcome measure was change in the frequency of going outside. The frequency of going outside will be assessed in a telephone interviews at baseline and at 1, 2, 4 and 6 months follow-up. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The following secondary outcomes will be assessed in a telephone interview at baseline, and at 1, 2, 4 and 6 months follow-up: 1. Fear of Falling (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]-FOF) 2. Unsafe feelings (VAS for Feeling Unsafe) 3. Quality of Life (VAS-EQ-5D). 4. Falls (data on falls were collected prospectively with use of fall calendars) | — |
Countries
Netherlands
Outcome results
None listed