Skip to content

Bonding success rate of 2 different composites used for the bonding of attachments for the Invisalign® system

Bonding success rate of 2 different composites used for the bonding of attachments for the Invisalign® system

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN65557322
Enrollment
51
Registered
2024-08-05
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion Oral Health

Interventions

Two composite materials (Transbond and Tetric Ceram) for attachments for orthodontic aligner treatments were used. Once bonded, the attachment loss was registered in the first 3 months. The patients w

Sponsors

Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients in permanent dentition between 12 and 75 years old 2. Men and women 3. Collaborator and with informed consent confirmed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients in mixed dentition 2. Syndromic 3. Undergoing orthognathic surgery 4. Teeth with porcelain crown or composite restauration.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The number of debonded attachments on each patient (2 groups: Transbond and Tetric Evo Ceram) measured using a visual inspection at T0 at the appointment when the attachments were bonded, and monthly for 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Differences in the failure rate (debonded attachments) regarding sex and age of the patient using data recorded in patient records at T0 at the appointment when the attachments were bonded, and monthly for 3 months

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Public ContactHugo Patural
hpatu@myuax.com+34 63857181

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026