Primary incisors restoration Oral Health
Conditions
Interventions
The study compares the results of 36 months of clinical performance of primary incisors restorations using an incremental layering technique with the nano-ceramic composite ceram.x® SphereTECTM one (D
2) examination of maxillofacial area, oral cavity, dentition, and soft tissues
3) radiographic assessment of hard teeth and periapical tissues (periapical X-ray in all cases
4) caries risk assessment.
Intraoral radiography was used to detect any abnormalities of the crown and root structures as well as the surrounding bone. Periapical X-ray at maxillary c
Sponsors
Institute of Immunology and Physiology
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Pediatric dental patients with the presence of two class-four caries cavities on the central incisors
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. History of coronary artery disease 2. Pre-excitation syndromes 3. Motor impairments (cerebral palsy and epilepsy) 4. Pacemakers 5. Drug addicts 6. Patients whose parents or guardians refused to give their consent to participate
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Quality of the conducted restoration by independent observers according to the modified Ryge Criteria at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months). The cavosurface marginal discoloration and color match was evaluated visually after air-drying the tooth and after removing the plaque (if necessary). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| There are no secondary outcome measures | — |
Countries
Russian Federation
Contacts
Public ContactAlexey Sarapultsev
Outcome results
None listed