Skip to content

To assess whether humidified oxygen is more effective than standard oxygen therapy in treating children with acute severe asthma

A pilot study to assess whether humidified oxygen is more effective than standard oxygen therapy in treating children with acute severe asthma

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN62616194
Enrollment
90
Registered
2013-11-21
Start date
2014-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Topic: Medicines for Children Research Network

Interventions

The three interventions are: 1. Standard cold, dry (unhumidified) oxygen therapy 2. Cold, humidified oxygen therapy 3. Warm, humidified oxygen therapy Primary intervention: in the A&E department, eac

Sponsors

Alder Hey Children's Hospital (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients between 2 and 16 years of age attending A&E with a clinical diagnosis of acute severe or potentially life-threatening asthma according to the BTS/SIGN guidelines and who still require oxygen after initial standard nebuliser therapy. For children 6 years and older, severe asthma will be based on the following criteria being met: 1. Oxygen saturations less than 92% while breathing room air and one of either: 2. Being too breathless to talk in complete sentences 3. Heart rate greater than 120/min 4. Respiratory rate greater than 30/min 5. Use of accessory neck muscles For children aged 2 to 5 years of age, severe asthma will be based on the following criteria being met: 1. Oxygen saturations less than 92% while breathing room air and one of either: 2. Being too breathless to talk or eat 3. Heart rate greater than 130/min 4. Respiratory rate greater than 50/min 5. Use of accessory neck muscles

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Requiring admission to intensive care at time of recruitment 2. Previous participation in this iteration of the Humox study 3. Other significant respiratory disease (chronic lung disease of prematurity, previous significant chest infections) 4. Any other significant underlying medical problem (immunodeficiency, neurological and cardiac conditions) 5. Previously or currently involved with a trial of a medicinal product in the three months preceding screening 6. Parents/guardians who are unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Length of time continuously spent in oxygen 2. Time until treatment ?stepped down? to hourly, two-hourly and four-hourly nebuliser therapy 3. Differences in oxygen saturation in air at set time points after entry into the study 4. Changes in Yung?s Asthma Severity Score and in the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure 5. Number of Salbutamol and Ipratropium Bromide nebules required by each patient following randomisation 6. Requirement for escalation of treatment (i.e. need for intravenous salbutamol/aminophylline or HDU/PICU) 7. Adverse events/tolerability 8. Length of stay in hospital

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not provided at time of registration

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026