Skip to content

Can new ultrasound scanning methods improve detection of prostate cancer?

Development of a new image processing method for super-resolution contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SR-CEUS) imaging of prostate tumours

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN62147629
Enrollment
25
Registered
2019-05-08
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate cancer Cancer

Interventions

This is a single cohort non-comparative diagnostic study. The intervention is super-resolution contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging of the prostate with a new image processing method. Patients with pr

Sponsors

Heriot-Watt University
Lead Sponsor
NHS Lothian
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Current inclusion criteria as of 09/03/2026: 1. Known or undergoing investigation for suspected prostate cancer Previous inclusion criteria: 1. Known or suspected prostate cancer 2. Already planned to undergo radical prostatectomy as the primary treatment modality

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Current exclusion criteria as of 09/03/2026: 1. Is unable or unwilling to give consent 2. Trans-rectal route is not accessible (e.g., a previous abdomino-perineal resection) 3. Has a known allergy to the ultrasound contrast agent 4. Has a contraindication or a relative contraindication to receiving the contrast agent as stipulated by the manufacturer Previous exclusion criteria: 1. Unable or unwilling to give consent 2. Known allergy to the ultrasound contrast agent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Identification of index prostate tumours by SR-CEUS. The data will be collected during the ultrasound scan, with approximately 30 mins in total for multiple videos to be saved. Histological prostate gland examination will be performed by a pathologist within 2 weeks of ultrasound scan and used as the reference standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. The comparative accuracy of bolus and continuous infusion of contrast regimes for prostate tumour detection 2. A qualitative assessment of the benefits of each contrast agent to include: 2.1. Feasibility of full image acquisition within maximum allowed dosage 2.2. Resolution of tumour imaging 2.3. Qualitative assessment of preference from the radiologist performing the procedure 3. Duration of ultrasound scanning required to obtain a full image set of the prostate gland 4. The association of prostate tumour SR-CEUS microvascular structure with prostate tumour pathological Gleason grade and pathological t stage 5. Tumour volume measured by SR-CEUS and using pathology techniques 6. Tumour volume location measured by SR-CEUS and using pathology techniques For all outcomes, the ultrasound videos will be saved after the procedure and processed using Matlab and ImageJ software at a later date, usually within the weeks after the original ultrasound scan. The resulting images from the ultrasound analysis will be compared to each other and to histological prostate data. The location and size of the tumour regions in the histology will be compared to that detected in the processed ultrasound data.

Countries

Scotland, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactMairead Butler
m.butler@hw.ac.uk01314513593

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026