Skip to content

Comparison of end-to-side vs side-to-side arteriovenous fistula formation in chronic renal failure patients

Comparison of maturation and functionality of end-to-side vs side-to-side arteriovenous fistula formation as hemodialysis access in chronic renal failure patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN62033470
Enrollment
330
Registered
2016-08-31
Start date
2016-09-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients that required the creation of an autogenous elbow arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as permanent access for chronic hemodialysis sessions Not Applicable

Interventions

Every surgeon and center participating in this study will perform their preferred anastomosis type (side-to-side vs end-to-side), and including the patient in the study will require close follow-up bu

Sponsors

Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult patients (more than 18 years of age) 2. Underwent new autogenous elbow arteriovenous fístulae as permanent vascular access for hemodialysis in the participating study centers 3. Primary accesses in this location (elbow) 4. In pre-dialysis or already under dialysis treatment 5. Understand this study 6. Able to come to control visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with previous native or prosthetic arteriovenous fistulae in the same elbow or proximally (previous distal wrist fistulas are allowed) 2. Previous history of ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis 3. Patients requiring prosthetic arteriovenous access 4. Patients that do not accept to participate in the study or refuse to come to control visits

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Maturation and utility of the AVF at one and 6 months follow-up: 1. Maturation will be defined, after physical examination by experienced and dedicated staff, as an easily palpable vein, with a straight-superficial segment, length more than 10 cm, sufficient diameter, and good palpable thrill (clinical maturation should assess an AVF that is expected to be suitable for hemodialysis [HD] access and considered appropriate for cannulation with two needles and expected to deliver sufficient blood flow throughout the HD) 2. Functionality: an AVF that is currently being used, successfully, for HD access during HD sessions, delivering the prescribed blood flow without complications

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complications, secondary interventions and patency (primary, assisted primary and secondary patency) at one and 6 months follow-up. 1. Complications may include: 1.1. AVF thrombosis (occlusion and loss of patency of the AVF) 1.2. AVF-induced ischaemia VA stages 2 to 4 (extremity malperfusion after AVF creation, including stages 2 - loss of sensitivity, pain during HD or exercise, stages 3 - rest pain, stages 4 - digital tissue loss) 1.3. Venous hypertension syndrome: upper arm and hand edema, swelling, cyanosis or ulcers due to increase of venous pressure 2. Secondary interventions: any surgical or endovascular procedure performed over a previous AVF, in order to increase patency, avoid the occlusion of the AVF, to treat stenosis or other problems that may affect AVF utility, or procedures declotting a thrombosed AVF in order to restore patency and utility of this AVF 3. Patency (primary, assisted primary and secondary patency): 3.1. Primary patency: the interval between AVF creation and the first re-intervention (intervention-free access survival) for access dysfunction or thrombosis or the time of measurement of patency 3.2. Assisted primary patency: interval between AVF creation and the first occlusion (thrombosis-free access survival) or measurement of patency including operative/endovascular interventions to maintain the AVF 3.3. Secondary patency: interval between AVF creation and the abandonment of this AVF (i.e. thrombosis) after one or more interventions or achievement of a censored event (death, change of HD modality, loss for follow-up)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026