Skip to content

Totally laparoscopic versus conventional ileoanal pouch procedure: A randomised controlled trial

Totally laparoscopic versus conventional ileoanal pouch procedure: A randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN61411448
Enrollment
160
Registered
2005-01-24
Start date
2004-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proctocolectomy Digestive System Familial polyposis or ulcerative colitis

Interventions

This is an intra-operatively randomised, controlled single centre trial of patients with familial polyposis (FAP) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who undergo primary elective restorative proctocolectomy. I

Sponsors

University of Heidelberg Medical School (Germany)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Hospitalised patients of the Department of General surgery, Visceral surgery, Trauma surgery and Outpatient Clinic of the University of Heidelberg, Medical School, who are planned for an elective restorative proctocolectomy either for familial polyposis or for ulcerative colitis. 160 patients (80 laparoscopic vs 80 conventional ileoanal pouch) will be enrolled in order to recruit the 65 evaluable patients per group for the primary endpoint.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not provided at time of registration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary objective of this study is to compare the totally laparoscopic with the conventional approach in regard to intraoperative blood loss and need for perioperative blood transfusions (within first 24 hours after surgery). We hypothesise that intraoperative blood loss and the need for peri-operative blood transfusions are significantly higher in the conventional group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
A set of surgical and non-surgical parameters related to the operation will be analysed as secondary objectives. These will include operative time, complications, postoperative pain, lung function, postoperative length of hospital stay, a cosmetic score and pre-and postoperative quality of life. Moreover an appraisal of patients as well as of physicians concerning the relevance of various outcome parameters will be evaluated as part of an additional scientific project in order to create a basis for further relevant research questions.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026