Skip to content

Ultrasound Cannulation of the Internal Jugular Vein

Ultrasound Cannulation of the Internal Jugular Vein: a prospective randomised controlled study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN61258470
Enrollment
1301
Registered
2006-05-23
Start date
2000-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critically ill patients Respiratory Critically ill

Interventions

Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein versus the standard landmark method

Sponsors

General State Hospital of Athens (Greece)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Amended as of 08/11/2010: Critical care patients which are hospitalised in the intensive care unit from January 2000 to December 2006 and were all mechanically ventilated requiring central/subclavian venous access for various therapeutic reasons. Initial information at time of registration: Critical care patients which are hospitalised in the intensive care unit from January 2000 to December 2006 and were all mechanically ventilated requiring central venous access for various therapeutic reasons.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who were not on mechanical ventilation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cannulation of the internal jugular vein was achieved in all patients using ultrasound and in 425 of the patients (94.4%), the landmark technique (p <0.001) was used. Average access time (skin to vein) and the number of attempts were significantly reduced in the ultrasound group of patients compared to the landmark group (p<0.001). In the landmark group, puncture of the carotid artery occurred in 10.6% of patients, hematoma in 8.4%, hemothorax in 1.7%, pneumothorax in 2.4% and central venous catheter-associated blood stream infections in 16% which were all significantly increased compared to the ultrasound group (p<0.001).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, left or right side of cannulation and in the presence of risk factors for difficult venous cannulation such as prior catheterization, limited sites for access attempts, previous difficulties during catheterization, previous mechanical complication, known vascular abnormality, untreated coagulopathy, skeletal deformity and cannulation during cardiac arrest between the two groups of patients. Furthermore, the physicians who performed the procedures had comparable experience in the placement of central venous catheters (p = non-significant).

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026