Skip to content

The usability and effectiveness of connecting technology on physical and psychosocial functioning of cardiovascular disease rehabilitees in usual rehabilitation

The usability and effectiveness of connecting technology on physical activity, physical and psychosocial functioning, participation and quality of life of cardiovascular disease rehabilitees - a cluster randomized trial with six month follow up in usual rehabilitation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN61225589
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-01-06
Start date
2015-09-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary artery disease rehabilitation (chronic phase) Circulatory System

Interventions

The participants consist of 60 volunteer cardiovascular disease rehabilitees from six rehabilitation courses in a 12-month coronary artery disease rehabilitation intervention. Three of the courses are

Sponsors

University of Jyväskylä
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Coronary artery disease rehabilitee with basic skills for using internet 2. Adults and elderly, no restrictions in age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Musculoskeletal diseases, cognitive diseases or problems with memory that clearly limit functional capacity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Objective physical activity (total physical activity: frequency, duration, intensity and patterns of movement [and different combinations of outcomes]), measured using Fitbit Zip® accelerometer. This study uses five times one-week recall during the intervention (baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months) and once during the follow up period (6 months). 2. Subjective physical activity (vigorous and moderate physical activity and walking [and different combinations of outcomes]), measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) three times during the intervention period (baseline, 6 months and at 12 months) and once during the follow up period (6 months).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Physical functioning: 1.1. Cardiorespiratory fitness, evaluated using submaximal level of functional capacity by using the 6-minute walking test. Outcome measures are: maximal oxygen uptake, heart rate, walking pace, Borg scale 0-10 (ATS Statements: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test 2002). Schedule of measurements is three times during intervention period (baseline, 6 months and at 12 months) and once during the follow-up period (6 months). 1.2. Body composition. measured by weight (kg), height (cm), body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (cm). Schedule of measurements is three times during intervention period (baseline, 6 months and at 12 months) and once during the follow-up period (6 months). 2. Quality of life, measured using The World Health Organization Quality of Life-assessment (WHOQOL-BREF). WHOQOL-BREF domains are physical health, psychological, social relationships, environment (WHOQOL Group 1996, WHOQOL Group 1998, Skevington ym. 2004). Schedule of measurements is three times during the intervention period (baseline, 6 months and at 12 months) and once during the follow-up period (6 months). 3. Adherence to treatment, measured by the times of log-in to the Movendos m-coach internet application and the amount of exercise according to the data that Movendos m-coach software has collected. The data is collected at the end of the 12-month intervention. 4. Technology acceptance, evaluated using a questionnaire (modified by Venkatesh & Bala 2008) with sections “perceived ease of use” and “perceived usefulness”. The data is collected at the end of the 12-month intervention. 5. Cost-effectiveness of connecting technology, evaluated based on the differential between the common benefits and costs. Outcomes are related to direct time-related costs of rehabilitee, rehabilitation employees and management of the rehabilitation center. The main health-related outcomes are related to physical activity and quality of life. Cost-effectiveness is evaluate

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026