Effectiveness of anesthesia in dental patients undergoing root canal treatment

Efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine as supplemental infiltration for mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN60713096

Enrollment

Registered

2021-02-23

Start date

2021-01-17

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Control of pain in symptomatic patients undergoing root canal treatment for mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis Oral Health

Interventions

We shall divide the patients into two groups after a standard inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) anesthesia fails, one group will receive 2% Lidocaine buccal infiltration and the other group will re

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Symptomatic adult patients having mandibular first and/ or second molar tooth diagnosed with acute irreversible pulpitis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients taking antibiotic 2. Medically compromised 3. Effective inferior alveolar nerve block 4. Patients with immature root apex 5. Non-restorable teeth 6. Patient refused to sign the inform consent 7. Pregnant patient 8. Patient with history of allergy from any of the contents of anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pain measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) after 5 minutes of anesthesia	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
There are no secondary outcome measures	—

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Contacts

Public ContactThonayan Alodhaib

361108742@qudent.org+966 0559785542

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026