Skip to content

Better explanations for diagnoses in your medical record: use and ratings of an information button to clarify diagnoses in a hospital patient portal

Diagnoses clarification by patient-friendly terms and definitions and generalization to concepts with patient-friendly terms and definitions: usage and quality improvement feedback in a real-time hospital patient portal

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN59598141
Enrollment
3500
Registered
2022-04-12
Start date
2022-04-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Explanation of diagnoses via a patient portal Not Applicable

Interventions

We have developed a method to generalize diagnoses to more general concepts that do have patient-friendly terms and definitions in the SNOMED CT Netherlands Patient-Friendly Extension (PFE), by employ

Sponsors

Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Any patient portal user. Patient portal users can be the patients themselves or others that are authorized to use the portal to access the patient’s EHR functionality through the portal. They can be authorized by the patient themselves or be the parents of a child that is a patient at the hospital for instance. The target number of participants concerns the expected number of users that will visit the patient portal's problem list during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any user that uses the portal for testing purposes with a test account, e.g. an application manager.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. The coverage of the clarifications, measured as the median percentage of diagnoses with a clarification that was displayed per patient (number of diagnoses with a clarification divided by the number of diagnoses), measured during the 9-week study period 2. The use of the clarification functionality, measured as the median percentage of unique info-buttons clicked compared to the total number of info-buttons per patient (number of diagnoses with clarifications) displayed on the diagnosis list, as measured during the 9-week study period

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. User characteristics of users for each step: unique user logins, users that view their diagnosis list, users that clicked on any info button, user ratings, from the number of logins, views, clicks and ratings per user. User characteristics are user type (authorized or patient user), age group and gender, as measured during the 9-week study period 2. Diagnosis clarification level: for each diagnosis the number of times users log in for a patient with that diagnosis, number of times the diagnoses were viewed, the info button was clicked, and the feedback received. Users can rate the quality of the clarifications on a seven-point scale from very bad to very good and optionally describe in a free-text input field why they provided that rating. Measurements are about the 9-week study period

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactHugo J.T.;Hugo J.T. van Mens;van Mens

;

h.j.vanmens@amsterdamumc.nl;h.j.vanmens@amsterdamumc.nl+31 (0)204939000;+31 (0)204939000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026