Skip to content

A study comparing pelvic floor muscle exercises with and without the use of computer feedback for women with urine leakage (OPAL)

OPAL: a multicentre randomised trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for female stress or mixed urinary incontinence

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN57746448
Enrollment
600
Registered
2014-01-10
Start date
2014-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Female stress or mixed urinary incontinence Urological and Genital Diseases Stress incontinence

Interventions

1. PFMT intensified with use of electromyography biofeedback both at home and in clinic. 2. Basic PFMT. Both groups will be seen for six appointments and intervention

Sponsors

Glasgow Caledonian University (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Women 18 years of age or above, presenting with a new episode of stress or mixed urinary incontinence (UI) 2. Who are willing and eligible to be randomised

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Women who have urge UI alone 2. Women who cannot contract their pelvic floor muscles 3. Women who had formal instruction in PFMT in the last three years 4. Women who are pregnant or less than one year postnatal 5. Women who have prolapse greater than stage II, who have pelvic cancer, cognitive impairment or neurological disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
International Consultation on Incontinence short form questionnaire (ICIQ-UI SF) measured at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Urinary outcomes 1. Number of episodes of UI per day, recorded by women in a bladder diary [Locher et al 2001] 2. Impression of global improvement in UI (PGI-I) [Yalcin and Bump 2003] 3. Number of women with UI cured and number with UI improved, derived from the ICIQ-UI ShortForm (cured is a negative response to both 'how often do you leak urine?' and 'how much urine do you usually leak (whether you wear protection or not)?' 4. Uptake of surgery for UI 5. Uptake of other treatment for UI 6. Other urinary symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS) [Brookes et al 2004] Quality of life outcomes 1. UI-specific quality of life (Kings Health Questionnaire) [Kelleher et al 1997] 2. General health (EQ-5D-3L) [EuroQol Group] Pelvic floor related outcomes 1. Prolapse symptoms (POP-SS - Hagen et al 2009) 2. Bowel symptoms (early version of ICIQ Bowel Short Form) 3. Pelvic floor muscle function (Oxford scale - Laycock 2008, ICS method - Messelink et al 2005) 4. Self-efficacy for PFMT (PFME self-efficacy scale) [Chen 2004] 5. Adherence to PFMT (exercise diary/follow-up questionnaire) Economic outcomes 1. Cost and use of NHS services 2. Cost to the women and their families/carers 3. The incremental costs, QALYs and incremental cost per QALY derived by the economic model.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026