Skip to content

Efficacy and safety of using insulin glargine 300 U/mL in patients with type 2 diabetes on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs failing to achieve their blood sugar targets

Initiation of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in type 2 diabetic patients after failure of pre-existing BOT treatment with any other basal insulin

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN56991780
Enrollment
3000
Registered
2019-07-03
Start date
2015-06-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in adult patients requiring basal insulin therapy Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Interventions

All data were collected three times during this NIS
at baseline, approximately 6 and approximately 12 months after starting insulin glargine 300 U/mL therapy. Baseline documentation (documentation 1) had to start immediately after switching to insulin
i.e. actual dose and frequency of dose changes during the last four weeks. Data had to be generated during daily clinical routine of the physicians. Any change in the patient’s antidiabetic therapy re

Sponsors

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with type 2 diabetes (basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs) with any basal insulin except insulin glargine 300 U/mL 2. Adults and seniors: age at least 18 years, no upper age limit 3. HbA1c between 7.5% to 10.0% 4. Fasting blood glucose > 130 mg/dL 5. Ability and willingness to perform blood glucose self-monitoring

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Type 1 diabetes 2. Contraindications for therapy with insulin glargine 300 U/mL 3. Existing insulin therapy with basal and bolus Insulin (i.e. basal-bolus insulin therapy, premixed insulin therapy) 4. Patients with known cancer disease 5. Pregnancy 6. Drug or alcohol abuse 7. Dementia or general incapacity to understand the content of the observational study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fasting blood glucose (FBG) response rate during month 1-6 and month 1-12 after start of insulin glargine 300 U/mL treatment, respectively; response being defined as achieving at least two FBG values = 110 mg/dL (= 6.1 mmol/L) within the respective observational period. Response rates were summarized with frequency distribution and, in addition, adjusted frequency distribution considering only patients with nonmissing data. Exact 95% confidence intervals (CI) according to Clopper-Pearson were calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Unless stated otherwise, measured at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months: 1. Absolute change in HbA1c [%] 2. Absolute change in fasting blood glucose (FBG) [mg/dL] 3. Response rate 6 and 12 months after start of insulin glargine 300 U/mL treatment defined by: 3.1. Either reaching two FBG values =110 mg/dL (=6.1 mmol/L) or at least once the predefined individual HbA1c target value 3.2. Reaching at least one HbA1c value [%] equal or less to the predefined individual HbA1c target value 3.3. Reaching two FBG values =110 mg/dL (=6.1 mmol/L) and at least once the predefined individual HbA1c target value 4. Time from start of insulin glargine 300 U/mL treatment to response for each of the response endpoints (see definitions above, including primary efficacy parameter) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Reaching a response criterion for the first time was considered as event in these analyses. Response in FBG required at least two values =110 mg/dL (=6.1mmol/L) whereas start of response was defined at the first occurrence. Patients without response were censored at the date of last measurement of FBG or HbA1c, respectively. Median time to response and corresponding 95% CI were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, cumulative incidence curves were produced. 5. Duration (persistence) of response for each of the response endpoints (see definitions above, including primary efficacy parameter) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Only patients with documented response and valid duration time (not missing, not negative) were included in these analyses. End of response was defined as one of the following (depending on endpoint definition): 5.1. The second FBG value >110 mg/dL (>6.1 mmol/L) after start of FBG response 5.2. The first HbA1c value [%] above the predefined individual target

Countries

Austria, Germany, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026