Skip to content

A comparative study of static magnetic field (SMF) therapy against transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy on mechanical back pain and neck pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN56847801
Enrollment
50
Registered
2004-09-30
Start date
2003-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases: Back pain Musculoskeletal Diseases Back pain

Interventions

Patients referred via the three chronic pain consultants will be entered into the study if fitting the inclusion criteria. A trial of two therapies: conventional TENS using a programmable machine and

Sponsors

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2004 Update - Department of Health (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Chronic pain consultants referrals only 2. Patients normally eligible for TENS therapy 3. Ability to understand simple instructions 4. Ability to apply therapies by self/significant other 5. Patients with a diagnosis of mechanical back or neck pain only (no neurological deficits)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who have a pacemaker 2. Have intracranial clips/aneurysms 3. Would not be able to apply therapies by self or have no help for applying 5. Are outside the age range 6. Are pregnant or may be trying to get pregnant Reasons include: magnets can increase the failure of pacemakers, having metal work within the head area. Pregnancy: magnets may be harmful to the unborn child (although it has not been clinically proven).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We have developed a short questionnaire to be completed at the end of each therapy to identify if there has been any change in the pain or their behaviour. We are looking for differences in: 1. Level of pain 2. Functional activity 3. Medication reduction 4. Sleep activity 5. Quality of life Each section can score a maximum of 20, the lowest number of 0 being the best outcome. The total of all sections are calculated to a maximum of 100. The higher the score the worse the outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not provided at time of registration

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026