Skip to content

Accuracy of digital impressions for dental implant crowns

Analysis of passive fit through the use of photogrammetry for taking impressions of implants: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN56481825
Enrollment
48
Registered
2023-11-14
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with at least one implant awaiting impression-taking or registration to make and place their implant-supported crown Oral Health

Interventions

Randomization will be performed using a Microsoft Excel®-generated randomization list, with the treatment allocation contained in sealed envelopes that will be prepared by a research assistant not inv

Sponsors

Arrow Development SL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with implants placed in the clinics participating in the study who are awaiting impression taking or registration to make and place the implant-supported crown

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with implants placed in other clinics whose prior treatment is unknown and may interfere with the objectives of the study 2. Implants with mobility whose indication will be their removal due to lack of integration 3. Implants that already have implant-supported crowns and there is an indication to repeat the crown due to fracture or loss of retention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Passive adjustment or fit measured at the radiographic level. Measurements will be made using image analysis software (Image J. National Institutes of Health (NIH); Bethesda, MD, USA) calibrating the software through a known length, which could be the length of the implant. This is measured from the implant shoulder of the implant to the first bone-to-implant contact in both the mesial and the distal aspects in radiographs (two points per implant). Measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Probing depth measured with a periodontal probe (UNC-15, Hu Friedy, Chicago, IL) at six points per implant at baseline, 6 months and 12 months 2. Bleeding on probing measured with a periodontal probe (UNC-15, Hu Friedy, Chicago, IL) at six points per implant at baseline, 6 months and 12 months 3. Time for taking impressions or registrations on implants during the prosthetic procedure, measured with a watch in minutes and seconds 4. Radiographic variables: radiographic bone loss measured from the shoulder of the implant to the first bone-implant contact in both mesial and distal aspects at two points per implant at baseline, 6 months and 12 months 5. Patient perception measured with a questionnaire and visual analogue score at baseline after the prosthetic procedure

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026