Skip to content

Pilot study comparing needle placement for Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) using CT navigation versus conventional CT-guidance

Pilot study comparing needle placement for Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) using CT navigation versus conventional CT-guidance: a non-randomized prospective two-arm study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN55383115
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-05-09
Start date
2015-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver cancer Cancer

Interventions

Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) is a novel method for focused treatment of liver tumors. IRE is a soft tissue ablation technique using ultra short but strong electrical fields to create permanent a

Sponsors

University Hospital Regensburg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients must be scheduled for CT guided percutaneous IRE in the liver 2. Written informed consent 3. Male patients and non-pregnant, non-lactating females aged =18 years of age (negative serum/urine pregnancy test result at screening)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Any condition which, in the judgment of the clinical investigator or his designee, might increase the risk to the subject or decrease the chance of obtaining satisfactory data to achieve the objectives of the study 2. A mental condition rendering the patient unable to provide informed consent 3. Patients with hereditary haematological / coagulation disorders unrelated to their liver disease. 4. Patients who are currently (within the last 30 days prior to surgery) participating in another clinical trial with any investigational drug or device 5. Patients undergoing liver surgery for the purpose of receiving a liver transplant or for liver trauma 6. Patients with established renal insufficiency (Creatinine >2.5 mg/dl), or a condition requiring hemodialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time required for the placement of IRE needles (measured from the time of the first CT scan to the start of the ablation).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Accuracy of IRE needle placement compared to a patient-specific ablation strategy (accuracy is measured as distance to the target point, distance between needles, angles between needles) 2. Overall procedure time 3. Number of lesions treated per patient 4. Number of needle replacements 5. Number of control scans 6. Radiation dose

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026