Skip to content

A phase-IV randomised, double blind comparative evaluation of immunogenicity of Monovalent Type 1 Oral Poliomyelitis Vaccine (mOPV1) versus trivalent OPV (tOPV): four-armed study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN54186735
Enrollment
720
Registered
2007-09-07
Start date
2007-09-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Polio Infections and Infestations Polio

Interventions

Control group: 2 drops (approximately 0.1 ml) standard dose tOPV manufactured by Panacea at birth and 30 days of age Intervention group 1: 2 drops (approximately 0.1 ml) standard potency mOPV1 manufac

Sponsors

Panacea Biotec Limited (India)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy infants (greater than or equal to 2.5 kg birth weight, apgar score at 5 minutes greater than or equal to 9) 2. Born at study sites (maternity hospitals) 3. Residing less than 30 km away from study site 4. Not planning to travel during entire study period (birth to 2 months)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Newborns requiring hospitalisation 2. Birth weight less than 2.5 kg 3. Apgar score at 5 minutes less than 9 4. Residence greater than 30 km from study sites 5. Families expecting to be absent during the 60 day study period 6. A diagnosis or suspicion of immunodeficiency disorder (either in participant or immediate family member)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Seroconversion 30 days after a single dose of tOPV or mOPV1.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Seroconversion after two doses of vaccine (one of three mOPV1 vaccines and tOPV).

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026