Skip to content

Assessing the use of artificial intelligence in rectal magnetic resonance imaging

Quantitative assessment of image quality in rectal cancer MR images when using artificial intelligence reconstruction techniques

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN53688111
Enrollment
75
Registered
2024-11-29
Start date
2024-12-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Validation of deep learning reconstruction techniques used in clinical MRI rectum studies. Cancer

Interventions

This is a single-centre blinded observational study to demonstrate Deep Learning Reconstruction-enabled rectum MRI protocols are equivalent or superior to the pre-existing clinical protocol. Healthy

Sponsors

St George's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Staff: Staff in the Medical Physics and Engineering group Patients: 1. Adult patients who have been referred to St George’s Hospital General Radiology MRI department for an MRI pelvis study 2. Able to withstand up to an additional 15 minutes in the MRI scanner

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Any volunteer who is not an adult 2. Pregnancy 3. Any patient who cannot give informed written consent 4. Cannot complete a screening questionnaire 5. Has not been referred for an MRI pelvis scan for a rectum study at St George’s Hospital General Radiology MRI department as an outpatient 6. Is an at-risk patient 7. Non-English speakers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Following a reduction in the acquisition time, equivalent image quality is achieved demonstrated by median Likert scores of the DLR enabled protocol >= median Likert scores of the clinical protocol as assessed by a blinded radiologist. Assessment is performed only once, following the MRI acquisitions. Likert scoring consists of a five-point system that assesses: signal to noise ratio; rectal wall sharpness/conspicuity; overall image quality; and bowel motion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Agreement between the clinically relevant measurements of rectal tumours on DLR enabled versus clinical scans using biomarker measurements following the MRI acquisition at one timepoint 2. Potential benefits of using DLR-enabled protocols, including shortened acquisition times and improved imaged quality measured using key performance indicators, such as increased patient throughput, over the course of the study

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactZach Pang
zach.pang@stgeorges.nhs.uk+44 (0)2082666244

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026