Skip to content

A pilot study to inform future research into the use of ankle weights with adults who are learning disabled

A pilot study to inform future research into the use of ankle weights with adults who are learning disabled

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN50975609
Enrollment
10
Registered
2007-09-28
Start date
2006-09-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Learning disorders Mental and Behavioural Disorders Learning disorders

Interventions

Purpose: This is a pilot study intended to inform the power calculations and methodology of a larger study. Whilst the pilot may provide some indication of the impact of the use of ankle weights, a la

Sponsors

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Participants will be learning disabled adults who attend a walking group 2. All participants will have had a health check to ensure there are no health reasons for not wearing ankle weights

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Person does not wish to take part 2. Person finds walking with weights problematic (eg due to balance, gait, fitness level, comfort, allergic reaction)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure will be percentage body fat (i.e. the percentage of total body weight that is fat). Body fatness is associated with morbidity and mortality. Percentage body fat will be measured using Tanita body fat scales; these scales use bioelectrical impedance and have been demonstrated to be accurate at measuring percentage body fat (Ohno, Nishisaka, & Ikeda, 1998; Utter, Nieman, Ward, & Butterworth, 1999).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Additional outcome measures are: Body Mass Index (BMI): is a measure of the degree of overweight, in relation to an individual?s height (Height/weight2). BMI is a predictor of morbidity and mortality due to numerous chronic diseases and predicts more variance in health risk than does Waist Circumference alone (Janssen, Katzmarzyk, & Ross, 2004). Waist circumference (WC): is a measure of abdominal obesity gained using a tape measure (Aronne & Segal, 2002). It relates closely to BMI yet is a simpler measure to obtain. It is the best indicator of changes in intra-abdominal fat during weight loss (Lean, Han, & Morrison, 1995). A higher WC measurement indicates higher health risk and the addition of waist circumference to BMI predicts a greater variance in health risk than does BMI alone (Janssen et al., 2004). Cardiovascular function: Resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate measurements will be taken at each time point using a sphignomanometer. Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE): Perceived Physical exertion is a measure of how hard someone feels they are working during exercise and should decrease as a person?s fitness level improves (Borg, 1998). RPE will be measured using the OMNI Picture System of Perceived Exertion (Robertson, 2004). The OMNI walking to running scale will be used: this has a set of picture and verbal cues in conjunction with a numerical rating scale of 0 to 10 (with 0 being 'not tired at all' and 10 being 'very, very tired'). Research studies have established the validity and reliability of the scales (Robertson, 2004). Participants will indicate how they feel on the walking scale (a copy of the scale is provided in the protocol Appendix). The physiotherapy technicians will make a judgement about how tiring those participants who have difficulty using the rating scale felt during the walk via physical signs of exertion (i.e. breathing, sweating, eas

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026