Skip to content

Needle penetration versus placebo device: Double-Blind Acupuncture trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN50179298
Enrollment
50
Registered
2007-01-26
Start date
2000-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy volunteers, no disease Signs and Symptoms Pain, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

A placebo needle, which cannot penetrate the skin, and a real needle, which can penetrate the skin.

Sponsors

Hanada College (Japan)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy volunteers familiar with acupuncture treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unhealty volunteers 2. Healthy volunteers unfamiliar with acupuncture treatment

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Intensity of needle sensations on a VAS.

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Amount of pain eliciting painful electrical stimulation on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026