Skip to content

Pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer

A feasibility randomised controlled trial of pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN48569216
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-06-12
Start date
2014-07-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Topic: Cancer, Ear, nose and throat, Gastroenterology

Interventions

Study participants will be randomised to one of two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio: 1. Pre-CRT (chemo-radiation treatment) gastrostomy arm G-tube insertion will take pl

Sponsors

Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with stage III and IV HNSCC who are suitable for primary CRT with curative intent. This can include patients having induction chemotherapy prior to CRT. All patients would have been investigated and diagnosed as above by the respective cancer MDT. Main inclusion criteria are as follows: 1. Grade 1 pre-treatment dysphagia, as defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (defined as: asymptomatic/symptomatic/able to eat regular diet) 2. Consent to be randomised 3. Adult patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who: 1. Decline to participate 2. Are unable to give informed consent 3. Cannot receive a gastrostomy for medical reasons 4. Do not receive treatment with curative intent 5. Have malnutrition requiring immediate initiation of enteral feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Assess willingness to randomise (by qualitative interviews with clinicians) and be randomised (by review of patient screening logs) 2. Assess retention and drop-out rates

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Assess compliance and refine interventions and study processes 2. Estimate parameters to inform definitive trial design 3. Assess value of information based on modelling exercise 4. Assess incidence of reported adverse events

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026