Skip to content

Does liaison psychiatry improve the cost-effectiveness of health care delivery to depressed elderly medical in-patients? A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN46437760
Enrollment
138
Registered
2004-01-23
Start date
2002-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression, anxiety, neuroses Mental and Behavioural Disorders Depressive episode

Interventions

1. A visit by a specialist nurse within the first week of admission (intervention arm) 2. Put on a waiting list to see a member of the research team at home (control arm)

Sponsors

NHS R&D Regional Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 65 years or over, admitted to general medical wards of a district general hospital (West Suffolk Hospital) with a stay over 5 days, over a period of 15 months (January 2002 to March 2003).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unable to give informed consent to enter the study due to moderate/severe dementia or other reasons 2. No spoken English 3. Dependent upon alcohol or other psychotropic drugs 4. Due to be transferred or discharged on the day of the initial assessment 5. Too physically ill or too confused to be interviewed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Resolution of ICD10 depression and change in depression rating measured by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 16 weeks after the initial assessment compared between intervention and comparison groups, adjusted for severity of disability at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in quality of life score (EuroQOL), difference in patient satisfaction (adapted version of patients' satisfaction with stroke services questionnaire), change in carer burden (Caregiver Strain Index and GHQ-12) at 16 weeks after the initial assessment, compared between intervention and comparison groups. (References for standardised measures given in attached research proposal.) Cost-effectiveness ratios for the health benefits resolution of depression, change in depression and quality of life scores) compared to the resource costs in each arm of the study will be calculated. Resources consumed in secondary care (costs of index admission, subsequent inpatient stay and outpatient contact), primary care (GP consultations, contact with nursing staff including specialist psychiatric nurse), and number of hours care from social services will be calculated from routine data sources including hospital information systems, GP and medical records and social services information systems. The economic impact of the intervention upon patients and their carers will also be evaluated.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026