Skip to content

Early Surgery versus optimal Current step-up prActice for chronic PancrEatitis (ESCAPE)

Early Surgery versus optimal Current step-up prActice for chronic PancrEatitis (ESCAPE): a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN45877994
Enrollment
88
Registered
2011-03-25
Start date
2011-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic pancreatitis Digestive System Chronic pancreatitis

Interventions

Early surgical intervention: Surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct (pancreaticojejunostomy) if pancreatic head is not enlarged (< 4 cm) or surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct a

Sponsors

Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Registration criteria: 1. Age 18 years 2. Confirmed chronic pancreatitis: according to the M-ANNHEIM diagnostic criteria 3. Dilated pancreatic duct [5 mm, established by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), Computerised Tomography (CT) or Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)], with or without enlargement of the pancreatic head 4. Presence of moderate, non-debilitating pain. This will be defined as chronic abdominal pain (present for at least 3 months) sufficiently relieved with non-opioid analgesics Randomisation criteria (after fulfilling inclusion criteria for registration): 1. Need for upgrade from non-opioids to opioid analgesics: newly developed need for opioids analgesics (opioids needed at least 3 days per week) and persistently needed for at least 2 weeks in a row 2. Informed consent for randomisation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. History of prolonged need of opioids for chronic pancreatitis for a period over 2 months in the last 2 years 2. Previous pancreatic surgery 3. Previous endoscopic dilatation or stenting of the pancreatic duct 4. Episode of biliary obstruction in the last 2 months (defined as jaundice or bilirubine levels 25 micromol / L) or the presence of a stent in the common bile duct (CBD) 5. Proven autoimmune pancreatitis (including elevated levels of gamma-globulins (IgG)) 6. Suspected or established pancreatic malignancies 7. Life expectancy of < 1 year for any reason 8. Presence of duodenal obstruction necessitating surgery, as judged by the expert panel 9. Presence of a pseudocyst larger than 6 cm necessitating intervention, as judged by the expert panel 10. Contra-indications for surgery, always evaluated by the expert panel (e.g. American Society of Anesthesiology class IV, severe portal hypertension due to occluded portal vein) 11. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary clinical outcome is the degree of pain as assessed by the Izbicki pain score at 2 weeks intervals during the follow-up period of 18 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Cost-effectiveness, total direct and indirect costs-during 18 months follow-up period 2. Severe complications related to disease progression or endoscopic and surgical interventions 2.1. Mortality (all-cause) 2.2. Disease progression: development of pseudocysts, pancreatic insufficiency (endocrine or exocrine), gastric outlet or duodenal obstruction, chronic use of opioids (defined as need for opioids for a period > 6 months), hospital admissions for CP upflares 2.3. Endoscopic intervention: (acute) pancreatitis flare up, cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, retroperitioneal or bowel perforation, abdominal sepsis, intra-abdominal abscesses needing intervention, bleeding needing transfusion or intervention, any relaparotomy for other reasons 2.4. Surgical intervention: anastomotic leakage, bleeding needing transfusion or intervention, abdominal sepsis, intra-abdominal abscesses needing intervention, burst abdomen, severe wound infection (requiring prolonged hospital stay), any relaparotomy for other reasons 3. Quality of life-assessed by validated questionnaires. 4. Izbicki score at 18 months follow-up 5. Endocrine pancreatic insufficiency-determined by use of anti-diabetic medication or abnormal serum glucose levels (fasting serum glucose levels > 6,0 mmol/L in capillary blood or > 6,9 mmol/L in venous plasma at two different days 6. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency-determined by fecal elastase levels (50% from baseline in the Izbicki score with a final score >10 points 7.2. Visual analogue score (VAS) for pain: measured as part of the Izbicki score 7.3. Büchler pain score: alternative pain measure based on the Izbicki questionnaire, and calculated by the multiplication of two of the four items of the Izbicki questionnaire (i.e. pain frequency and pain intensity) 8. Number and

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026