Skip to content

PerClot compared to usual care in gynaecology

A prospective, multicentre, randomized, safety and effectiveness study of PerClot compared to usual care during gynaecology procedures

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN45856014
Enrollment
90
Registered
2015-07-15
Start date
2015-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gynaecology surgical procedures Surgery

Interventions

Half the patients will be randomised to receive PerClot. The dose will be dependent on the surface area and will usually be 3G or 5G. The other half of the patients will be randomised to receive usual

Sponsors

CryoLife Europa (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subject is over 18 2. Subject is having a gynaecological procedure 3. Subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol 4. Subject is willing and able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subject with a history of pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy (within 8 weeks of surgery) 2. Subject is pregnant or actively breastfeeding 3. Subject has a ruptured ectopic pregnancy 4. Subject has a history of abnormal coagulopathy 5. Subject has a sensitivity to starch or starch derived materials 6. Subject has an active or potential infection at the surgical site 7. Subject is currently enrolled in another study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Achievement of haemostasis measured in minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Absence of reintervention for post operative bleeding

Countries

Italy, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026