Skip to content

Aortic valve replacement in high risk patients: conventional surgery compared with catheter-based techniques

Randomised trial of transcutaneous versus surgical aortic valve replacement

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN45792044
Enrollment
657
Registered
2009-05-26
Start date
2009-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe aortic valve stenosis Circulatory System Nonrheumatic aortic valve disorders

Interventions

Arm 1: Transcutaneous aortic valve implantation (n = 219) Arm 2: Aortic valve replacement (n = 219) Arm 3: Best medical therapy (n = 219)

Sponsors

St George's Healthcare NHS Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. After a multidisciplinary meeting, patients (both males ane females) with expected mortality >15% (Euroscore) and/or >10% (Society of Thoracic Surgeons Mortality Risk [STS] score) 2. Severe aortic stenosis, confirmed by trans-thoracic echocardiography using a combination of measurements of valve area and flow dependent indices (mean gradient >50 mmHg). Low dose dobutamine echocardiography is useful to differentiate between severe and the rare 'pseudo-severe' aortic stenosis in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction and low gradient. 3. Severe aortic stenosis, +/- one vessel coronary artery disease amenable to percutaneous intervention 4. Age >70 (if age II 6. Patients who are able to give consent 7. If it is thought that risks of mortality and morbidity with surgery outweigh the benefits, the patients will be randomised into cohort B

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Aortic regurgitation 2. Patient preference - TAVI is not recommended for patients who simply refuse surgery on the basis of personal preference 3. Aortic annulus 25 mm for balloon expandable and 27 mm for self-expandable devices 4. Bicuspid aortic valve 5. Present of asymmetric heavy valvular calcification 6. Aortic root dimensions >4.5 cms 7. Presence of apical left ventricular thrombus 8. Evidence of acute myocardial infarction <30 days 9. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 10. Life expectancy <1 year due to non-cardiac causes Specific contraindications for transfemoral approach: 1. Iliac arteries with severe calcification tortuousity and small diameter (6-9 mm), previous aorto-femoral bypass 2. Severe angulation of aorta and atheroma of the outcome and coaptation, aneurysm of the abdominal aorta with mural thrombus 3. Presence of bulky atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta and arch Specific contraindications for the transapical approach: 1. Previous surgery of the left ventricle using a patch such as the Dor procedure 2. Calcified pericardium 3. Severe respiratory insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Death within the first year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The following will be assessed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months for the first year, then 6-monthly until the end of 3rd year: 1. Evidence of prosthetic valve dysfunction 2. Postoperative bleeding 3. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular complications 4. Heart block and need for pacemaker implantation 5. Conversion from TAVI, emergency valve surgery 6. Length of hospital stay and discharge to rehabilitation centre or home 7. Length of hospital stay 8. Improved quality of life, assessee by SF-36® Health Survey and Six-Minute Walk test

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026