Skip to content

CAPABLE: Comparing the Patient Generated Index (quality of life tool) in patients and caregivers to standard measures in the high-grade brain tumour population

CaPaBLE: Caregiver and Patient less-Burden Life Evaluation - A Phase II observational study comparing the Patient Generated Index (Quality of life tool) in patients and caregivers to conventional QoL measures in the high-grade brain tumour population

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN45555598
Enrollment
130
Registered
2020-12-16
Start date
2020-06-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quality of life in newly diagnosed/ recurrent high-grade primary brain tumour patients and their caregivers Not Applicable

Interventions

This is an observational study
patients will therefore receive treatment as clinically indicated, in line with standard guidelines. Potential participants will include any patient that is referred to the Brain Tumour MDT and/or neu

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient: 1. Newly diagnosed, or recurrent, high-grade primary brain tumour. We define a high-grade tumour as any grade 3 or 4 primary brain tumour (including meningioma) 2. Newly diagnosed patients intending to undergo neurosurgical biopsy or resection, or to start a course of radical (>=45 Gy) radiotherapy or a course of chemoradiotherapy or stereotactic radiotherapy. 3. Recurrent brain tumours patients undergoing further treatment including surgery, chemotherapy or re-irradiation. 4. Performance status 0, 1, or 2 5. Able to provide written informed consent 6. Intention to attend at least 5 clinic visits over a 6-month period to the study site 7. Age 18 years and above 8. Willing to undertake study-specific measures Caregiver: 1. Main caregiver of patient with newly diagnosed or recurrent high-grade primary brain tumour 2. Caregiver of patient receiving treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy/ chemotherapy) expected to last >=3 weeks in total 3. Aged 18 years and above 4. Intention to attend at least 5 clinic visits over a 6-month period to the study site 5. Willing to undertake study-specific measures 6. Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient: 1. Diagnosed with a low-grade brain tumour (including grade 1 and 2 meningiomas) 2. Poor performance status (PS 3,4) or rapidly deteriorating fitness and for best supportive care and/or symptom control only 3. Diagnosed with a high-grade brain tumour but not planned for any intervention 4. Language barriers 5. Poor cognition status based on clinical assessment/ Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)/ MDT) 6. Refusal to participate Caregiver: 1. Severe cognitive problems based on the doctor’s opinion 2. Language barrier 3. Ongoing active treatment for own medical condition expected to significantly limit attendance for study assessments (missing 2 or more clinic visits). To be assessed by attending clinical or research team

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Feasibility and acceptability of novel, personalised measures of HRQoL in patients with brain tumours and their caregivers, which will be assessed using completion rates at the end of the study 2. Patient quality of life measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 4 months, 6 months using the following: 2.1. Patient Generated Index 2.2. Cancer quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) 2.3. Quality of Life Questionnaire - Brain Cancer Module (BN20) 2.4. EQ-5D (at 6 weeks and 4 months only) 3. Caregiver quality of life measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 4 months, 6 months using the following: 3.1. Caregiver Generated Index 3.2. CareGiver Oncology Quality of Life questionnaire (CarGoQoL) 3.3. EQ-5D (at 6 weeks and 4 months only)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient, caregiver and professional views on the comparative benefits and drawbacks of standard approaches and PGI/CaGI measured using two focus groups (midway through and end of study) where patients, caregivers and multi-disciplinary staff will be invited to have open discussions in regards to the PGI/ CaGI vs standard methods. In each session we will ask participants to express their views and thoughts, and then reflect emerging themes to the group to stimulate further discussion.

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactLillie Pakzad-Shahabi
lillie.shahabi@nhs.net+44 (0)7894 790450

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026