Skip to content

Does using sit-stand desks at work affect how many calories people burn and how much time they spend sitting over the entire day? A feasibility study

Impact of sit-stand desks at work on energy expenditure and sedentary time: a feasibility study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN44827407
Enrollment
620
Registered
2015-11-24
Start date
2015-12-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prolonged sitting time Other

Interventions

This study comprises four Phases: Phase I consists of an online survey aiming to explore: 1. Eligible participants’ interest in participating in a trial aiming to assess the use of sit-stand desks

Sponsors

University of Cambridge (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Office-based employees working for two organisations in Cambridge UK 2. Work at least 0.6 full-time (22 hours a week) 3. Spend at least 70% of a working week performing desk-related activities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Are already using sit-stand desks 2. Have musculoskeletal disorders that make prolonged standing inadvisable 3. Have chronic illnesses that prevent prolonged periods of standing 4. Are planning to be absent from the workplace for more than 14 working days during the study period 5. Are pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
This feasibility study is not powered to detect changes in outcome measures but to assess the feasibility and acceptability of procedures planned for a full-scale trial. Phase I The following outcomes will be assessed via online questionnaire: 1. Proportion of eligible participants interested in taking part in a 3 month trial on the use of sit-stand desks at work (Outcome 1 of Phase I) 2. Proportion of eligible participants interested in taking part in a 6 month trial on the use of sit-stand desks at work (Outcome 2 of Phase I) 3. Demographic characteristics (Outcome 3 of Phase I) 3.1. Age 3.2. Gender 3.3. BMI 3.4. Salary band 3.5. Highest educational qualification 3.6. Position within company 3.7. Postcode of primary residence 4. Proportion of participants preferring desk mounts vs full desks (Outcome 4 of Phase I) 5. Proportion of participants preferring to be assessed at home vs work vs the clinical research facility (Outcome 5 of Phase II) Phase II 1. Proportion of workplaces suitable for full desks and desk mounts assessed via workplace auditing and recording (Outcome 1 of Phase II) 2. Proportion of workspaces permitting participants’ choice of desk to be installed (Outcome 2 of Phase II) Phase III 1. Practicalities of delivering the intervention, assessed by recording (Outcome 1 of Phase III): 1.1. The time lapse between ordering the desks from the manufacturer and their delivery 1.2. Any permissions needed to install each desk type 1.3. The feasibility of training research staff to install desks 1.4. The feasibility of one person (a trained research assistant) installing each desk without help 1.5. The amount of time needed to install each desk 1.6. Any problems associated with delivering the desks to participants 1.7. Any problems installing each desk type 1.8. The practicalities associated with removing existing desks (applicable only when using full desks) 2. Circumstances and factors affecting desk use assessed via direct observations and diaries/lo

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026