Skip to content

Effects of a food supplement in women with stress-predominant urinary incontinence

Efficacy of a food supplement based on collagen and magnesium in women with stress-predominant urinary incontinence: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN43204817
Enrollment
56
Registered
2025-01-21
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment of urinary incontinence and improvement of quality of life Urological and Genital Diseases

Interventions

This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted over a 6-week follow-up period at the Nutratech S.r.l. facilities (Rende, CS, Italy) between June and September 202

Sponsors

Ekuberg Pharma
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy Caucasian women aged 45 to 70 years 2. A diagnosis of stress (S) and/or urge (U) urinary incontinence (UI) confirmed by a board-certified gynecologist based on clinical anamnesis and the answers to the Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID). The cut-off value was set at = 4 for SUI and = 6 for UUI.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. A positive medical history of pathologies (acute, chronic, or progressive) or pharmacological treatments (i.e. alpha-adrenergic blockers/stimulants, anticholinergics, calcium channel blockers, psychoactive drugs, misoprostol, opioids, hormone replacement therapy, diuretics) that could potentially interfere with the test product 2. Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials 3. Participation in a similar trial without an adequate washout period 4. Food intolerance or food allergies (including allergies to ingredients of the test product) 5. Concomitant use of food supplements, topical products or procedures to treat UI 6. Prior use of UI-active products or procedures without an adequate washout period 7. History of drug, alcohol, or substance abuse 8. Nutrition and eating disorders (e.g. bulimia, psychogenic eating disorders, etc.) 9. Pregnancy or breastfeeding women 10. Absence of adequate contraceptive measures in women of childbearing age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Improvement in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urge urinary incontinence (UUI) symptoms measured using the Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID) before and after 6 weeks (W6) of product use 2. The gynecologist's opinion of the product's efficacy measured using a verbal rating scale at the end of the treatment period

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life (QoL) measured using a QoL questionnaire consisting of 10 items focused on the participant's perception of the urinary incontinence discomforts in the last two weeks. Answers were on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 (“not at all”) to 10 (“maximum discomfort”) before and after 6 weeks (W6) of product use

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactDavide Carati
davide.carati@ekubergpharma.com+39 0836574512

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026