Skip to content

Comparing the effectiveness of different training packages at preparing clinical staff to deploy mechanical chest compression devices

A comparison of training packages for deployment of mechanical chest compression devices in clinical practice: a randomised controlled manikin trial (COMPRESS-SIM)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN43049287
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-06-30
Start date
2016-06-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Specialty: Critical care, Primary sub-specialty: Critical care

Interventions

Teams in the trial will be randomised to receive either standard training (control group) or pit-crew training (intervention group). Teams will be individually randomised in a 1:1 ratio using an inter

Sponsors

University of Warwick
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. NHS clinical staff (e.g. doctors, nurses, paramedics) that have current registration with a professional body (General Medical Council; Nursing and Midwifery Council; Health and Care Professions Council 2. Hold a current Resuscitation Council (UK) Immediate Life Support or Advanced Life Support qualification, or other equivalent resuscitation qualification 3. Provide written informed consent for participation 4. Prior to randomisation, participants must also have completed the manufacturer on-line training package on use of the device

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Staff that have an injury or disability that prevents the use or handling of the mechanical chest compression device 2. Receipt of formal training in use of the LUCAS-2 mechanical chest compression device in the last six months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Flow-fraction in the minute preceding the delivery of the first chest compression by the mechanical device, as measured in the testing scenario.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
All outcome measures will be measured during the simulation testing scenario): 1. Adherence to manufacturer recommended process for device deployment, measured using the manufacturer checklist document 2. Non-technical skills, measured using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure tool 3. Chest compression quality, measured as flow-fraction, pre-shock pause, post-shock pause, and peri-shock pause. The overall duration of the arrest will be defined as the point that cardiac arrest is confirmed (on completion of 10-second breathing/ pulse check) to delivery of the final chest compression 4. Time to first mechanical chest compression, measured from time of arrival of the mechanical chest compression device. 5. Number, duration and causes of any chest compression interruptions that exceed 5-seconds 6. Cause of any incident of delayed time to first mechanical chest compression- to be recorded if period from arrival of device to first mechanical chest compression is greater than 60-seconds

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactClaire Jacques
compresstrial@warwick.ac.uk+44 2476 575923

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026