Skip to content

Assessing the effects of subperiosteal tunnels in rhinoplasty on post operative bruising and swelling

Postoperative ecchymosis and edema following subperiosteal tunnels in rhinoplasty: a blinded randomised clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN42741475
Enrollment
34
Registered
2018-10-01
Start date
2015-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-operative ecchymosis and edema in rhinoplasty Surgery Post-operative ecchymosis and edema in rhinoplasty

Interventions

Subjects were randomly assigned to undergo subperiosteal tunneling on one side of the nose during rhinoplasty. The other side of the nose underwent rhinoplasty without the creation of tunnels. The ran

Sponsors

McGill University - Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 17 years or older 2. Aesthetic rhinoplasty requiring bilateral osteotomies

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Rhinoplasty without ostetomies 2. Rhinoplasty with unilateral or intermediate osteotomy 3. Not willing to provide informed consent 4. 7 day follow-up not possible due to scheduling conflicts

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The following are graded on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) 2 and 7 days after surgery: 1. Ecchymosis 2. Edema

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026