Eating disorders / body dissatisfaction Mental and Behavioural Disorders Eating disorder, unspecified
Conditions
Interventions
Participants in classes allocated to the intervention arm received six 50 minute sessions outlined in the Me, You & Us manual, focusing on media literacy, peer interactions, boosting mood and self-est
Sponsors
King's College London (UK)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: School inclusion criteria: UK based secondary school with students in years 8 and/or 9 Participant inclusion criteria: student (male or female) in year 8 or 9 in participating secondary school
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Participant exclusion criteria: 1. Lack of parental/carer consent 2. Insufficient English language ability to understand assent procedures or complete questionnaire measures
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Participant self-reported body esteem, assessed by the 23-item Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults. Questionnaires were administered at baseline, post-intervention and three-month follow-up | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Participant self-reported questionnaires assessing: 1.1. Eating pathology (Eating Disorders Diagnostic Scale, 22 items) 1.2. Thin-ideal internalization (Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Scale ? Internalization, 9 items) 1.3. Appearance conversations with friends (Appearance Conversations with Friends Scale, 5 items) 1.4. Peer support (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support ? Friends, 4 items) 1.5. Depressive symptoms (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, 21 items) 1.6. Self-esteem (1 item) All questionnaires administered at baseline, post-intervention and three-month follow-up 2. In addition participants provided feedback on the acceptability of the intervention at post-intervention with two self-report items assessing how much students liked the lessons and how helpful they found the lessons 3. Feasibility of the mode of delivery was assessed through observations of two intervention lessons in each participating school, which were rated based on the number of activities outlined in the manual that were completed in the session | — |
Countries
United Kingdom
Outcome results
None listed