Skip to content

A double blind prospective randomised controlled study comparing absorbable versus non-absorbable suture techniques in Carpal Tunnel Release.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN41229063
Enrollment
40
Registered
2005-09-30
Start date
2003-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nervous System Diseases: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) Nervous System Diseases Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)

Interventions

After patients have agreed to participate, they will be randomised into one or other of the treatment arms: 1. Technique A = Using a continuous subcuticular absorbable 3.0 polyglactin 910 (vicryl) su

Sponsors

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2005 Update - Department of Health (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 40 patients, aged between 18 to 75 years are invited to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not provided at time of registration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Residual postoperative pain using Visual Analogue Scale 2. Scar tenderness 3. Preoperative and postoperative symptoms using CTS Symptom Severity Score 4. Preoperative and postoperative functional status using CTS Functional Status Scale 5. Extent of wound healing

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not provided at time of registration

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026