Premature infants Neonatal Diseases Premature infants
Conditions
Interventions
43 families with 55 children were randomized in the intervention group and 44 families with 53 children in the control group.
The aim of our individualised, family-based intervention was to integra
Sponsors
Beta Institute for Research and Development in Social Medicine (Germany)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Families with premature births <32 weeks Gestational Age (GA) or birth weight below 1500 g and cared for in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the University Children Hospital, Bonn, Germany, between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2003.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Families living more than 100 km from the hospital 2. Mother did not speak German 3. Infant was transferred to another hospital 4. Infant died or suffered major malformations
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary outcome measure was the improvement in social-interactive behaviour of the infants, mother's sensitivity and the dyadic quality of interaction. Before discharge the nurses assessed the early mother sensitivity with the Boston City Hospital Assessment of Parental Sensitivity (BCHAPS)(Timepoint 1). This questionnaire consists of 13 closed-ended items, evaluating the mother's sensitive responsivness and care giving competence. The items are ranked on 5-point scales from "poor" to "competent" and the scores totalled. At 6 months corrected age the infant social-interactive behaviour and mother-infant interaction were assessed with the Mother-Infant Structured Play Assessment (MISPA)(Timepoint 2). This is an 8-minute, semi-structured face-to-face play interaction which includes the Still-Face Paradigm, which provides a method to access infant regulatory capacities and illustrates central qualities of the young infant's capacities for interpersonal engagement. For the interaction records the infants were placed on a blanket or mat on the floor and mothers were asked to sit on the floor opposite their infant. A mirror was mounted at an angle, which enabled the examiner to videotape both the face and body of the infant and the face and upper torso of the mother. Standardised instructions were used to explain the procedure to the mothers. Episode 1 involved the mother playing with her baby with a rattle (warm-up). After 2 minutes (Episode 2) she was cued to lay aside the rattle and play (without a toy) with her baby for another 2 minutes. Then she was asked to get her baby to watch her face, which lasted for 1 minute (Episode 3). Next she was asked to make a still-face for 1.5 minutes (Episode 4) and then finally asked to resume playing with her baby for another 1.5 minutes (Episode 5). Three existing schemes were modified and adapted to create a suitable coding scheme: 1. The Play Observation Scheme and Emotion Ratings (POSER) 2. The Emotional Availability | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The demographic characters and the medical and psychosocial burden of the families were recorded with a structured mother-interview at both time points. Several items of the interview ware totalled showing a dyadic adjustment scale and a psyochosocial stress-index. | — |
Countries
Germany
Outcome results
None listed