Skip to content

Comparing imaging techniques in the management of liver disease

The role of ultrasound shear wave elastography in the management of liver disease

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN40384680
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-03-17
Start date
2016-03-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Topic: Hepatology

Interventions

Imaging using the Philips EPIQ 7™ Ultrasound System, the Siemens Acuson (ARFI) Ultrasound System, and by Echosens Fibroscan™ (which is currently the best validated technique).

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Able and willing to provide written informed consent 2. Aged between 18 and 75 3. Chronic liver disease 4. About to undergo a liver biopsy as part of standard routine clinical care, or if a liver biopsy has recently been performed, and is willing to come in for a specific research visit for the 3 scans 5. Willing to consent to medical notes and diagnostic test results being reviewed, captured, and recorded by the clinical research study team

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unable or unwilling to give written informed consent 2. Aged under 18 or over 75 3. No evidence of liver disease 4. Pregnancy 5. Patients with pacemakers fitted

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To correlate liver stiffness assessed by the Philips EPIQ 7™ Ultrasound System, the Siemens Acuson (ARFI) ultrasound system, and by Echosens Fibroscan™ (which is currently the best validated technique), and compare the results of these 3 imaging techniques to histological results in patients with chronic liver disease of different aetiologies.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Cut-off values of the liver stiffness (LS) measurements that correlate to the histological fibrosis stage 2. Variations of the liver stiffness (LS) measurements correlated to different parameters 3. Quality parameters (IQR and SR) for the liver stiffness (LS) measurements 4. Ability of distinguishing non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactClaire Parsonage
c.parsonage@imperial.ac.uk+44 1285 650696

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026