Skip to content

Response to an invitation to Self-sampling for Human papillomavirus (HPV) versus repeat Invitation for cervical screening in persistent non-responders in NEwcastle upon Tyne

A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of response to an invitation to self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) versus repeat invitation for cervical screening in persistent non-responders in Newcastle upon Tyne

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN39154605
Enrollment
300
Registered
2012-10-04
Start date
2012-09-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical screening Cancer

Interventions

Self-collection: Women who have failed to attend for cervical cytology screening and have reached Point 4 as detailed above (NEPCSA cervical screening invitation schedule) will be posted an invitation

Sponsors

Queen Mary University of London (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Non-responders according to the North East Primary Care Services Agency (NEPCSA) recall process. They will have received their initial screening letter, plus a first reminder letter, plus at least two non-responder cards will have been sent to their General Practitioner, identified using the NEPCSA Exeter National Health Applications and Infrastructure Services (NHAISs) System.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Women who have written to the NEPCSA to document their refusal to take part in the NHSCSP 2. Women who contact the trial team and ask to be excluded from the trial 3. Pregnancy 4. Total abdominal hysterectomy 5. Never been sexually active 6. Women who are identified as becoming pregnant or undergoing hysterectomy following the initial test will be excluded from the analysis of data for secondary outcomes 7. HPV self-sample returned without a signed Informed Consent Form (ICF) (the Participant Information Leaflet (PIL) will state that samples returned without a signed consent form cannot be processed) 8. Informed Consent Form (ICF) returned with incomplete contact details whereby the test results cannot be sent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Response to the intervention - The proportion of women responding to the intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. The proportion of women responding to the intervention by returning the HPV self-sampling test within 3 months 2. The proportion of women responding to the intervention by attending for cervical cytology within 3 months 3. The proportion of women responding to the further invitation to attend for cervical cytology within 3 months 4. The proportion of women attending for a cervical cytology within 3 months having had a positive HPV test 5. The proportion of women attending for colposcopy (within 7 months of being sent their HPV self-sampling kit) having had a positive HPV test and abnormal cervical cytology of borderline or mild dyskaryosis and HPV triage positive or cytology of moderate dyskaryosis or worse. 6. The proportion of women in the comparator group attending for colposcopy within 3 months of abnormal cervical cytology of borderline or mild dyskaryosis and HPV triage positive or cytology of moderate dyskaryosis or worse 7. The proportion of women in the comparator group attending for colposcopy within 3 months of abnormal cervical cytology of borderline or mild dyskaryosis and HPV triage positive or cytology of moderate dyskaryosis or worse compared with the proportion of women attending for colposcopy (within 7 months of being sent their HPV self-sampling kit) having had a positive HPV test and abnormal cervical cytology of borderline or mild dyskaryosis and HPV triage positive or cytology of moderate dyskaryosis or worse

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026