Skip to content

Duodenum-preserving head resection versus pancreatico-duodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis of the head

Duodenum-preserving head resection versus pancreatico-duodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis of the head: a randomised controlled multicentre trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN38973832
Enrollment
200
Registered
2009-04-30
Start date
2009-05-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic pancreatitis Digestive System Other diseases of pancreas

Interventions

Experimental intervention: Any surgical technique that removes inflamed pancreatic tissue of the head without resection of the duodenum (e.g. Beger, Frey or Berne procedure). Control intervention:

Sponsors

Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC) (Germany)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients (no age or gender restrictions) with chronic pancreatitis of the head and pain, eligible for elective surgical resection 2. Ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial 3. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participation in another intervention-trial with interference of intervention and outcome of this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Average QoL during 24 months after surgery, measured 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer patients (EORTC QLQ-C30) scale "physical functioning". The primary efficacy analysis will be conducted for the intention-to-treat population. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model will be applied for the intervention group comparison adjusting for age, centre and EORTC QLQ-C30 scale "physical functioning" before surgery. The level of significance is set at 5% (two-sided) and sample size is determined to assure a power of 1-beta = 90%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Exploratory analyses

Countries

Germany, Netherlands, Slovenia, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026